The United States has vowed to send humans to Mars on the planet by 2030, but space experts and MPs expressed concern on Wednesday that poor planning and lack of funds will delay those plans.
In a hearing in Washington, Senator Bill Nelson said that the White House’s decision to return to the moon – a program former President Barack Obama stopped to focus on reaching Mars – could pull the whole process. The United States has vowed to send humans to Mars on the planet by 2030, but space experts and MPs expressed concern on Wednesday that poor planning and lack of funds will delay those plans. President Donald Trump has announced the goal of sending the Moon to the Americans for the first time since the Apollo missions of 1960 and 1970, which are building the Moon Gateway to test technology and spacecraft, Will take on In a hearing in Washington, Senator Bill Nelson said that the White House’s decision to return to the moon – a program former President Barack Obama stopped to focus on reaching Mars – could pull the whole process.
Florida’s Democrat Nelson said, “Cape Canaveral is home to the Kennedy Space Center,” we do not want to rob NASA’s budget, and the goal is to reach Mars. “Do these missions help us in achieving our goal of bringing humans to Mars?” In 2009, an independent expert panel headed by the Augustine Commission warned that NASA’s resources With its annual budget of about $ 18 billion, NASA will need an extra $ 3 billion per year to build Mars.
NASA officials have recently said that they are trying to prepare a deep space program with very little while using inflation based hikes in the budget. And the National Academies of Science has calculated that if NASA’s budget continues on its current path, then forget about the scenario of going to Mars by 2030. It will take us to 2050, “said Nelson. “I do not think we want to wait for a long time.” “Evidence in the hearing, Chris Carberry, Chief Executive Officer of Exploration Mars, said that international and private partnerships can help the United States make it more economical to reach Mars.
– Related Global Partners
He told the MPs, “Our international partners want us to lead.” “But they worry that we keep changing direction. They are not sure that we are going to stick to the direction.” Carberry said, moreover, the aerospace experts have identified nearly a dozen technologies, “If we have any hope of landing humans on Mars in the 2030s, then we have to start working very quickly.”
These include the developing spacecraft which can avoid harsh penetration in the planet Mars and save the soil gradually enough, as well as the ability to lift people from the surface and return to the Earth. Carberry said, “It will take a lot of time to achieve something.” We have to start working on them now. “While praising NASA’s bilateral support, he sees among the MPs, who is a Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz, who heads the Senate sub-committee on space, said he hopes that the next NASA funding bill of Congress will come from year to year, Instead of going to the year, will offer long-term vision.
“This next NASA authority, hopefully, will go ahead and be bold in its aspirations,” he said. Cruise then asked retired NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, who spent a 665-day US record in space, needed to move forward for his idea of this. He replied, “The most important thing is the perseverance of the purpose.” “We should have an attitude that runs from more than one administration. We have a budget line which will support the goals and objectives we are trying to reach.”
Space Experts, Mars in the 2030s, United States, Spacecraft test, Mars, landing on Mars, Mars to NASA, Mars to the United States, developing space, NASA authority